Call Back Later
All these exclusions and defections will suggest to many that cultural
phenomenology is really nothing at all, or nothing at all of any interest
or importance, insofar as it has no coherent and definable substance, and
therefore no chance of focussing collective endeavour and effecting any purchase
on things. But my real point is that you cannot argue meaningfully for or
against cultural phenomenology in such theoretical terms, since the whole
point about cultural phenomenology as here conceived is that it is a kind
of work that does not proceed from or consciously contribute to theoretical
discourse and the work of critical programming it has come to subserve. If
a certain kind of work begins to come about, why then it will have come about,
and will become due for evaluation, in all the usual, different ways in which
things get evaluated. If it does not, there will be no opportunity or need
to have gone to the trouble of evaluating it. I know, I know, time is short,
and we need to know, if possible in advance, what's most worth investing
time and effort in (I am supposed to be a utilitarian, aren't I?) But it
really would not be a good use of time to try to come to a view about what
cultural phenomenology could, might or must do in advance of the thing actually
coming to be done. My advice is to wait until there is any of this stuff
available and then, if ever, have a theoretical think about how well its
way of working works out.
|
| Steve Connor | English and Humanities | Birkbeck College |