Cultural Phenomenology Loses the PlotOne of the biggest problems
with mother-ship phenomenology for a cultural phenomenologist is actually
that it has got so good at acting surprised by the inherence of man and
world (well fuck me, it looks like I've really got to die like all these
other people), that it is always secretly and comfortably resigned
to having to. Phenomenology wanes into amazement as into a friendly pair
of slippers. This self-betrayal is one of the things that is so
bad about phenomenology. Unfolding Husserl's work of 'pure, presuppositionless
description', phenomenology has actually secreted and seated itself upon
a reef of presuppositions regarding the ultimate nature and point of such
work of description. Everyone knows what phenomenology is for; it is to
overcome the split between body and mind, and to make out what George Steiner
calls the 'modes of man's inherence in the world'. To sign up to phenomenology
is to sign up to the project of overcoming alienation. Phenomenology knows
without ever having to tell itself that the overcoming of alienation is
both desirable (since one must come to coincide with what one is, and must
of necessity unfold into the freedom which is one's destiny), and possible.
Indeed, it is more than possible, since no amount of delusion or bad faith
or privation can really alienate you from embodiment, temporality, and
all the other equiprimordial givens. The trumping move is, of course, to
include alienation as part of the package of predicaments, alienation being
the way in which we live our most distinctive relation to things. Given
all this, it is immaculately impossible that one should fail to achieve
the overcoming of alienation by habituation to it, should fail to be unhappily
at home in alienation.
|
| Steve Connor | English and Humanities | Birkbeck College |