A critical language such as the one I am hoping to see more of would have
to find a ways of becoming unaccommodated. This would mean trying to face
out and profit from the enfeebling of metacritical expertise; one ought sometimes
to be able not to be able to describe what one is doing, just as we
could do with getting better at not being as good at what we do. This is
hard to pull off, not just because we all nowadays, in all areas of life,
start to feel uneasy if we do not know what we are doing and why; but also
for the more particular reason that we have become so subjected and recruited
as a profession (but like so many other professions) to the demands of
prediction, to the reassurances of the plan, the policy, the abstract, the
research proposal. We toil too long into the night at the forging of these
future perfects, laying waste our powers in telling ourselves what we will
have done in our new module, our proposed research, our putative conference
paper, our forthcoming book, paying too readily the larger and larger tax
exacted upon our time by the demand to abstract, simplify, justify and even
evaluate our own work, all this rather than doing the work, or inventing
new ways in which the work might work, or come to be done.
|
| Steve Connor | English and Humanities | Birkbeck College |